Domestic vs Export Component Mall: Capability Comparison
Key takeaways
- Compare domestic vs export component malls across search, RFQ/BOM, inventory rules, locale, and settlement
- Domestic favors stocked paths
- export favors localized RFQ—sample ≥20 pages, pilot 10–15 days
How do domestic and export component malls differ? Compare five capability lanes: (1) search/part pages, (2) RFQ/BOM, (3) inventory wording, (4) locale fields, (5) settlement—not skin themes or a language toggle alone.
DAJIQUN has focused on component digital acquisition since 2019; public capability includes 30M+ MPN-scale architecture—scope follows the signed SOW. Biz +86 13826519287 · Tech +86 13798512083 · zyx@dajiqun.com.
How to read the capability map
Domestic stocked malls optimize short order paths; export sites usually stabilize localized RFQ first. Share master data, but accept different front-end checks.
Search and part pages
Both need fragment search, filters, and identifiable datasheets. Domestic often wants stock/price on-screen; export needs consistent locale labels (no broken package/temp translations). Sample ≥20 high-intent pages; withhold empty shells.
RFQ / BOM / samples
Export RFQ often comes earlier: attachments, target market, expected date, ≤6 fields above the fold, one ticket trail. Test mobile submit with readable failures.
Inventory wording
If you cannot sync available qty, publish lead-time ranges. Spot-check ≥3 critical parts. Do not claim live global stock before sampling passes.
Locale and settlement
Locale covers currency, tax hints, address fields, and reply SLAs—hreflang is a separate SEO topic. Payments can follow market needs after RFQ works.
- Minimum master-data fields shared.
- Search + part page + RFQ first.
- Inventory rules + ≥20-page sampling.
- Locale fields next; gateways later.
- Pilot 10–15 days before expanding.
See dev cautions, SKU-scale builds, and SEO+GEO audit.